
Consumer Protection
-

Walgreen Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Testosterone Supplement Makes False Efficacy and Unapproved Drug Claims
CASE NAME: Ferguson v. Walgreen Co.CASE NO.: 26CV01339JURISDICTION: Superior Court of California, County of Santa CruzFILED ON: April 20, 2026CLASS DEFINITION: All…
-

Target Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Ashwagandha Gummies Misrepresent Dosage Per Gummy
CASE NAME: Williams et al. v. Target CorporationCASE NO.: 3:26-cv-02534-H-BLMJURISDICTION: United States District Court for the Southern District of CaliforniaFILED ON: April…
-

Create Wellness, Inc. Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Creatine Gummies Contain Less Creatine Than Advertised
CASE NAME: Connolly v. Create Wellness, Inc.CASE NO.: 7:26-cv-3324JURISDICTION: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkFILED ON: April…
-

Oura Ring, Inc. Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Smart Ring Defect Causes Overheating and Burns
CASE NAME: Fomin et al. v. Oura Ring, Inc.CASE NO.: 3:26-cv-03955JURISDICTION: United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaFILED ON:…
-

PataFoods Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “Yogurt” Labeling Is Misleading Because Products Lack Yogurt Cultures
CASE NAME: Yuryeva v. PataFoods, Inc.CASE NO.: 2:26-cv-04037JURISDICTION: United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaFILED ON: April 15, 2026CLASS…
-

Babo Botanicals Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “Plant-Based” Labeling Is Misleading Due to Synthetic Ingredients
CASE NAME: Greenbach v. Babo Botanicals Inc.CASE NO.: 5:26-cv-03241JURISDICTION: United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaFILED ON: April 16,…
-

Hain Celestial Group, Manufacturer of Garden Veggie Puffs Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “No Artificial Ingredients” Claim Is Misleading Due to Synthetic Additives
CASE NAME: Paley v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.CASE NO.: 1:26-cv-02157JURISDICTION: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New YorkFILED ON:…
-

Lume Deodorant Named in Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Misleading Marketing of Intimate Hygiene Products as Necessary and Safe for Genital Use
CASE NAME: Moon v. Lume Deodorant, LLCCASE NO.: Not specifiedJURISDICTION: Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los AngelesFILED ON:…
Labels Matter
Connect with us





